Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for severe pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Rescue High‐frequency Jet Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Severe Pulmonary Dysfunction in Preterm Infants." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439463/all/. Accessed 02 May 2024.
Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for severe pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439463/all/. Accessed May 2, 2024.
Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for severe pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439463/all/
Rescue High‐frequency Jet Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Severe Pulmonary Dysfunction in Preterm Infants [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 May 02]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439463/all/.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Rescue high‐frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for severe pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants
ID - 439463
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439463/all/
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -