High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Infants With Severe Pulmonary Dysfunction Born at or Near Term." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437762/all/. Accessed 27 April 2024.
High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437762/all/. Accessed April 27, 2024.
High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437762/all/
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Infants With Severe Pulmonary Dysfunction Born at or Near Term [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 April 27]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437762/all/.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term
ID - 437762
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437762/all/
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -