Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non‐asphyxial out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Continuous Chest Compression Versus Interrupted Chest Compression for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Non‐asphyxial Out‐of‐hospital Cardiac Arrest." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436012/0/images/. Accessed 19 May 2024.
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non‐asphyxial out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436012/0/images/. Accessed May 19, 2024.
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non‐asphyxial out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436012/0/images/
Continuous Chest Compression Versus Interrupted Chest Compression for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Non‐asphyxial Out‐of‐hospital Cardiac Arrest [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 May 19]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436012/0/images/.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non‐asphyxial out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest
ID - 436012
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436012/0/images/
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -