Elective high frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Elective High Frequency Jet Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/432684/0/. Accessed 02 May 2024.
Elective high frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/432684/0/. Accessed May 2, 2024.
Elective high frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/432684/0/
Elective High Frequency Jet Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 May 02]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/432684/0/.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Elective high frequency jet ventilation versus conventional ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants
ID - 432684
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/432684/0/
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -