Guidelines for the clinical diagnosis of VTE (AAFP, ACP)

General

Clinical Question:
What are effective strategies in diagnosing venous thromboembolic events in primary care?

Bottom Line:
The main points of these guidelines to the diagnosis of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) are: 1. Begin by using validated clinical prediction rules, like the Wells prediction rule, to estimate the clinical likelihood of VTE. 2. In patients with a low clinical likelihood of VTE, a negative result from a high-sensitivity D-dimer test confirms that the patient is unlikely to have a VTE. 3. Perform an ultrasound of the lower extremities in patients with intermediate to high clinical likelihood of VTE. 4. Patients with intermediate or high clinical likelihood of pulmonary embolism require diagnostic imaging studies. (LOE = 1a)

Reference:
Qaseem A, Snow V, Barry P, et al, for the Joint American Academy of Family Physicians/American College of Physicians Panel on Deep Venous Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolism. Current diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in primary care: a clinical practice guideline from the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:57-62.  [PMID:17261865]

Study Design:
Practice guideline

Setting:
Various (guideline)

Synopsis:
This clinical practice guideline was derived from a well-done systematic review of the literature* performed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-Based Practice Centers. The guideline is aimed at any clinician who diagnoses VTE; there is an accompanying guideline on managing VTE.** The guideline answers questions about the role of clinical prediction rules, D-dimer tests, ultrasounds, and computed axial tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of VTE. The authors found 19 studies using clinical prediction rules, 17 of which used the Wells prediction rule. These studies support the use of prediction rules. With the combination of a negative D-dimer result and a negative clinical prediction rule in low-risk patients, the probability of VTE is quite low. The authors found 4 studies evaluating D-dimer testing without the concomitant use of a clinical prediction rule. These studies support the theory that a negative result from a highly sensitive D-dimer test can exclude VTE in low-risk patients. The evidence-based practice center review found ultrasound to be very sensitive (89%-96%) and specific (94%-99%) in diagnosing symptomatic proximal vein lower extremity thromboses. It is less sensitive in asymptomatic thromboses (47%-62%). The studies of CT were of variable quality and the results were less consistent. Because of this, further imaging is likely needed in patients who have a high pretest probability of pulmonary embolism and a negative CT scan result. *Segal JB, et al. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:63-73. ** Snow V, et al. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:74-80

Guidelines for the clinical diagnosis of VTE (AAFP, ACP) is a sample topic from the EE+ POEM Archive.

To view other topics, please or purchase a subscription.

Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Learn more.

Citation

* When formatting your citation, note that all book, journal, and database titles should be italicized* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC T1 - Guidelines for the clinical diagnosis of VTE (AAFP, ACP) ID - 426549 ED - Barry,Henry, ED - Ebell,Mark H, ED - Shaughnessy,Allen F, ED - Slawson,David C, BT - EE+ POEM Archive UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/infoPOEMs/426549/all/Guidelines_for_the_clinical_diagnosis_of_VTE__AAFP__ACP_ PB - John Wiley & Sons DB - Evidence Central DP - Unbound Medicine ER -