Insufficient study quality for biofeedback in constipation due to PFD
Clinical Question
Is biofeedback effective in treating constipation caused by pelvic floor dysfunction?
Bottom Line
Although biofeedback may be effective in the treatment of constipation due to pelvic floor dysfunction, the quality of the existing research is insufficient to prove it. (LOE = 2a)
Reference
Koh CE, Young CJ, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the effectiveness of biofeedback for pelvic floor dysfunction. Br J Surg 2008;95(9):1079-1087. [PMID:18655219]
Study Design
Systematic review
Funding
Self-funded or unfunded
Setting
Various (meta-analysis)
Synopsis
Most constipation can be easily managed with simple remedies: increase fiber and fluids, use laxatives, and so forth. However, patients who don't respond to simple measures have a high rate of pelvic floor dysfunction, thought to be an acquired maladaptive behavior that might be amenable to behavioral therapy. These authors searched several databases to find randomized controlled trials of biofeedback in the treatment of adults with constipation due to pelvic floor dysfunction. Two authors independently determined the eligibility of potential studies and then assessed the quality of each study. Disagreements were resolved by a third author. They identified 7 randomized controlled trials with 413 patients. The overall quality of the 7 studies was poor (high drop-out rates, poor description of randomization procedures, no blinding, etc.). Additionally, all the trials' study populations, study protocols, and outcomes assessments were heterogeneous. Three studies compared biofeedback with other treatments and 4 compared different biofeedback modalities. Although biofeedback in these studies was associated with "treatment success," the quality of the studies was poor enough to cast doubt on the results.
Citation
Barry, Henry, et al., editors. "Insufficient Study Quality for Biofeedback in Constipation Due to PFD." EE+ POEM Archive, John Wiley & Sons, 2025. Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/infoPOEMs/426118/all/Insufficient_study_quality_for_biofeedback_in_constipation_due_to_PFD.
Insufficient study quality for biofeedback in constipation due to PFD. In: Barry HH, Ebell MHM, Shaughnessy AFA, et al, eds. EE+ POEM Archive. John Wiley & Sons; 2025. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/infoPOEMs/426118/all/Insufficient_study_quality_for_biofeedback_in_constipation_due_to_PFD. Accessed December 6, 2025.
Insufficient study quality for biofeedback in constipation due to PFD. (2025). In Barry, H., Ebell, M. H., Shaughnessy, A. F., & Slawson, D. C. (Eds.), EE+ POEM Archive. John Wiley & Sons. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/infoPOEMs/426118/all/Insufficient_study_quality_for_biofeedback_in_constipation_due_to_PFD
Insufficient Study Quality for Biofeedback in Constipation Due to PFD [Internet]. In: Barry HH, Ebell MHM, Shaughnessy AFA, Slawson DCD, editors. EE+ POEM Archive. John Wiley & Sons; 2025. [cited 2025 December 06]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/infoPOEMs/426118/all/Insufficient_study_quality_for_biofeedback_in_constipation_due_to_PFD.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Insufficient study quality for biofeedback in constipation due to PFD
ID - 426118
ED - Barry,Henry,
ED - Ebell,Mark H,
ED - Shaughnessy,Allen F,
ED - Slawson,David C,
BT - EE+ POEM Archive
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/infoPOEMs/426118/all/Insufficient_study_quality_for_biofeedback_in_constipation_due_to_PFD
PB - John Wiley & Sons
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -

EE+ POEM Archive

