EE+ POEM Archive
For patients with ARDS, conservative oxygen strategy is no better, and may be worse, than a more liberal strategy (LOCO2)
For patients with ARDS, conservative oxygen strategy is no better, and may be worse, than a more liberal strategy (LOCO2) is a topic covered in the EE+ POEM Archive.
To view the entire topic, please sign in or purchase a subscription.
Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Explore these free sample topics:
There's more to see -- the rest of this entry is available only to subscribers.
Citation
Slawson, David C., et al., editors. "For Patients With ARDS, Conservative Oxygen Strategy Is No Better, and May Be Worse, Than a More Liberal Strategy (LOCO2)." EE+ POEM Archive, John Wiley & Sons, 2019. Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/infoPOEMs/1315032/all/For_patients_with_ARDS__conservative_oxygen_strategy_is_no_better__and_may_be_worse__than_a_more_liberal_strategy__LOCO2_.
For patients with ARDS, conservative oxygen strategy is no better, and may be worse, than a more liberal strategy (LOCO2). In: Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF, Ebell MH, et al, eds. EE+ POEM Archive. John Wiley & Sons; 2019. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/infoPOEMs/1315032/all/For_patients_with_ARDS__conservative_oxygen_strategy_is_no_better__and_may_be_worse__than_a_more_liberal_strategy__LOCO2_. Accessed October 1, 2020.
For patients with ARDS, conservative oxygen strategy is no better, and may be worse, than a more liberal strategy (LOCO2). (2019). In Slawson, D. C., Shaughnessy, A. F., Ebell, M. H., & Barry, H. (Eds.), EE+ POEM Archive. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved October 01, 2020, from https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/infoPOEMs/1315032/all/For_patients_with_ARDS__conservative_oxygen_strategy_is_no_better__and_may_be_worse__than_a_more_liberal_strategy__LOCO2_
For Patients With ARDS, Conservative Oxygen Strategy Is No Better, and May Be Worse, Than a More Liberal Strategy (LOCO2) [Internet]. In: Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF, Ebell MH, Barry H, editors. EE+ POEM Archive. John Wiley & Sons; 2019. [cited 2020 October 01]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/infoPOEMs/1315032/all/For_patients_with_ARDS__conservative_oxygen_strategy_is_no_better__and_may_be_worse__than_a_more_liberal_strategy__LOCO2_.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - For patients with ARDS, conservative oxygen strategy is no better, and may be worse, than a more liberal strategy (LOCO2)
ID - 1315032
ED - Slawson,David C,
ED - Shaughnessy,Allen F,
ED - Ebell,Mark H,
ED - Barry,Henry,
BT - EE+ POEM Archive
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/infoPOEMs/1315032/all/For_patients_with_ARDS__conservative_oxygen_strategy_is_no_better__and_may_be_worse__than_a_more_liberal_strategy__LOCO2_
PB - John Wiley & Sons
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -
