Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines
Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Biphasic Versus Triphasic Oral Contraceptives for Contraception." Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines, Duodecim Medical Publications Limited, 2019. Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/EBMG/455315/all/Biphasic_versus_triphasic_oral_contraceptives_for_contraception.
Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception. Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines. Duodecim Medical Publications Limited; 2019. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/EBMG/455315/all/Biphasic_versus_triphasic_oral_contraceptives_for_contraception. Accessed October 4, 2023.
Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception. (2019). In Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines. Duodecim Medical Publications Limited. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/EBMG/455315/all/Biphasic_versus_triphasic_oral_contraceptives_for_contraception
Biphasic Versus Triphasic Oral Contraceptives for Contraception [Internet]. In: Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines. Duodecim Medical Publications Limited; 2019. [cited 2023 October 04]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/EBMG/455315/all/Biphasic_versus_triphasic_oral_contraceptives_for_contraception.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception
ID - 455315
BT - Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/EBMG/455315/all/Biphasic_versus_triphasic_oral_contraceptives_for_contraception
PB - Duodecim Medical Publications Limited
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -
