Absorbent products for moderate-heavy urinary and/or faecal incontinence in women and men
A Cochrane review 1 included 2 studies with a total of 185 subjects. One trial took place in nursing homes, the other in people's own homes. Gender was found to be a significant variable in both trials, and accordingly the results were analysed in gender groups. The results show that there is no single best design. The main findings from the comparisons were:
- For all users, the leakage performance of the disposable inserts was worse than the other designs for day and night.
- For all users, disposable pull-ups were preferred and were rated better overall than disposable inserts for daytime.
- For all users, the newer disposable T-shape diaper was not preferred or rated better overall than the traditional disposable diaper for day or night use.
- For nursing home participants for ease of putting on, pull-ups and inserts were better than diapers and T-shaped diapers during the daytime, but during the night-time, pull-ups were more difficult to put on than the other designs.
- There was not enough evidence to draw firm conclusions about the performance of designs for faecal incontinence.
- There was no firm evidence that there were differences in skin health problems between designs.
Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by inconsistency (heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes) and by imprecise results (few patients and wide confidence intervals).
1. Fader M, Cottenden AM, Getliffe K. Absorbent products for moderate-heavy urinary and/or faecal incontinence in women and men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD007408. [PMID:18843748]
Copyright © 2021 Duodecim Medical Publications Limited.
Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Complete Product Information.