Amphotericin B versus fluconazole for controlling fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients

Evidence Summaries

Level of Evidence = D
There is no good evidence to compare oral amphotericin B with fluconazole for controlling fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients. However, amphotericin B is the only antifungal agent for which there is evidence of decreased mortality.

A Cochrane review 1 included 17 trials involving a total of 3798 patients and 381 deaths. In two large three-armed trials results for amphotericin B were combined with results for nystatin in a "polyene" group. Because nystatin is an ineffective drug in these circumstances, this approach creates a bias in favour of fluconazole. Furthermore, most patients were randomised to oral amphotericin B, which is poorly absorbed and poorly documented. There were no significant differences in effect between fluconazole and amphotericin B, but the confidence intervals were wide.

Comment: The quality of evidence is downgraded by study quality (several methodological limitations), by inconsistency (heterogeneity in interventions), by imprecise results (wide confidence intervals), and by publication bias. The authors' conclude: Amphotericin B has been disfavoured in several of the trials through their design or analysis. Since intravenous amphotericin B is the only antifungal agent for which there is evidence suggesting an effect on mortality [Evidence Level: C] and is considerably cheaper than fluconazole, it should be preferred.

References

1. cd000239


Copyright © 2019 Duodecim Medical Publications Limited.
Amphotericin B versus fluconazole for controlling fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients is a sample topic from the Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines.

To view other topics, please or purchase a subscription.

Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Complete Product Information.