Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Progestin Intrauterine Devices Versus Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/440413/all/Short‐acting_inhaled_bronchodilators_for_cystic_fibrosis_New. Accessed 17 April 2024.
Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/440413/all/Short‐acting_inhaled_bronchodilators_for_cystic_fibrosis_New. Accessed April 17, 2024.
Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/440413/all/Short‐acting_inhaled_bronchodilators_for_cystic_fibrosis_New
Progestin Intrauterine Devices Versus Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 April 17]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/440413/all/Short‐acting_inhaled_bronchodilators_for_cystic_fibrosis_New.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception
ID - 440413
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/440413/all/Short‐acting_inhaled_bronchodilators_for_cystic_fibrosis_New
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -