Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Rescue High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Pulmonary Dysfunction in Preterm Infants." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439988/all/repview. Accessed 08 May 2024.
Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439988/all/repview. Accessed May 8, 2024.
Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439988/all/repview
Rescue High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Pulmonary Dysfunction in Preterm Infants [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 May 08]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439988/all/repview.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants
ID - 439988
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439988/all/repview
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -