Cochrane Abstracts
Scalpel versus no‐scalpel incision for vasectomy
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Scalpel Versus No‐scalpel Incision for Vasectomy." Cochrane Abstracts, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2025. Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439061/1/Scalpel_versus_no‐scalpel_incision_for_vasectomy.
Scalpel versus no‐scalpel incision for vasectomy. Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2025. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439061/1/Scalpel_versus_no‐scalpel_incision_for_vasectomy. Accessed January 22, 2025.
Scalpel versus no‐scalpel incision for vasectomy. (2025). In Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439061/1/Scalpel_versus_no‐scalpel_incision_for_vasectomy
Scalpel Versus No‐scalpel Incision for Vasectomy [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2025. [cited 2025 January 22]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439061/1/Scalpel_versus_no‐scalpel_incision_for_vasectomy.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Scalpel versus no‐scalpel incision for vasectomy
ID - 439061
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/439061/1/Scalpel_versus_no‐scalpel_incision_for_vasectomy
PB - John Wiley & Sons, Inc
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -
