Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Editorial Peer Review for Improving the Quality of Reports of Biomedical Studies." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438905/all/Intralesional_treatment_versus_wide_resection_for_central_low_grade_chondrosarcoma_of_the_long_bones:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed 23 April 2024.
Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438905/all/Intralesional_treatment_versus_wide_resection_for_central_low_grade_chondrosarcoma_of_the_long_bones:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed April 23, 2024.
Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438905/all/Intralesional_treatment_versus_wide_resection_for_central_low_grade_chondrosarcoma_of_the_long_bones:_Cochrane_systematic_review
Editorial Peer Review for Improving the Quality of Reports of Biomedical Studies [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 April 23]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438905/all/Intralesional_treatment_versus_wide_resection_for_central_low_grade_chondrosarcoma_of_the_long_bones:_Cochrane_systematic_review.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies
ID - 438905
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438905/all/Intralesional_treatment_versus_wide_resection_for_central_low_grade_chondrosarcoma_of_the_long_bones:_Cochrane_systematic_review
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -