Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Regional Versus General Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section." Cochrane Abstracts, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2025. Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438342/all/Regional_versus_general_anaesthesia_for_caesarean_section.
Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2025. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438342/all/Regional_versus_general_anaesthesia_for_caesarean_section. Accessed February 13, 2025.
Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. (2025). In Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438342/all/Regional_versus_general_anaesthesia_for_caesarean_section
Regional Versus General Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2025. [cited 2025 February 13]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438342/all/Regional_versus_general_anaesthesia_for_caesarean_section.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section
ID - 438342
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438342/all/Regional_versus_general_anaesthesia_for_caesarean_section
PB - John Wiley & Sons, Inc
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -