Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Dual Chamber Versus Single Chamber Ventricular Pacemakers for Sick Sinus Syndrome and Atrioventricular Block." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438081/0/repview. Accessed 02 May 2024.
Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438081/0/repview. Accessed May 2, 2024.
Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438081/0/repview
Dual Chamber Versus Single Chamber Ventricular Pacemakers for Sick Sinus Syndrome and Atrioventricular Block [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 May 02]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438081/0/repview.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block
ID - 438081
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/438081/0/repview
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -