Anabolic‐androgenic steroids for alcoholic liver disease
Abstract
Background
Alcohol is one of the most common causes of liver disease in the Western World. Randomised clinical trials have examined the effects of anabolic‐androgenic steroids for alcoholic liver disease.
Objectives
To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of anabolic‐androgenic steroids for patients with alcoholic liver disease based on the results of randomised clinical trials.
Search methods
We searched The Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and Science Citation Index Expanded until June 2006. Electronic searches were combined with full text searches. Manufacturers and researchers in the field were also contacted.
Selection criteria
Randomised clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic steatosis, alcoholic fibrosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and/or alcoholic cirrhosis were included. Interventions encompassed anabolic‐androgenic steroids at any dose or duration versus placebo or no intervention. The trials could be double blind, single blind, or unblinded. The trials could be unpublished or published, and no language limitations were applied.
Data collection and analysis
Outcomes are assessed at maximal follow‐up. All analyses were performed according to the intention‐to‐treat method. The statistical package RevMan Analyses was used. The methodological quality of the randomised clinical trials was assessed.
Main results
Combining the results of five randomised clinical trials randomising 499 patients with alcoholic hepatitis and/or cirrhosis demonstrated no significant effects of anabolic‐androgenic steroids on mortality (relative risk (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 1.29), liver‐related mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.15), complications of liver disease (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.10), and liver histology. Anabolic‐androgenic steroids did not significantly affect a number of other outcome measures, including sexual function and liver biochemistry. Anabolic‐androgenic steroids were not associated with a significantly increased risk of non‐serious adverse events (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.59) or with serious adverse events (RR 4.54, 95% CI 0.57 to 36.30).
Authors' conclusions
This systematic review could not demonstrate any significant beneficial effects of anabolic‐androgenic steroids on any clinically important outcomes (mortality, liver‐related mortality, liver complications, and histology) of patients with alcoholic liver disease.
Author(s)
Andrea Rambaldi, Christian Gluud
Abstract
Plain language summary
No evidence to support anabolic‐androgenic steroids for alcoholic liver disease
Alcohol causes a major part of the liver diseases in the Western World. Several trials have addressed the effects of anabolic‐androgenic steroids for alcoholic liver disease. This systematic review could not demonstrate any significant effects of anabolic‐androgenic steroids on mortality, liver‐related mortality, liver complications, and histology of patients with alcoholic liver disease. Anabolic‐androgenic steroid intervention is not associated with a significant increase in non‐serious adverse events, but with the seldom occurrence of serious adverse events. Accordingly, there is no evidence supporting the use of anabolic‐androgenic steroids for alcoholic liver disease, but further randomised clinical trials may be needed to settle the question.
Author(s)
Andrea Rambaldi, Christian Gluud
Reviewer's Conclusions
Authors' conclusions
Implications for practice
This systematic review could not demonstrate any significant beneficial effect of anabolic‐androgenic steroids on mortality, liver‐related mortality, liver complications, and liver histology of patients with alcoholic liver disease.
Implications for research
The absence of evidence for an effect of anabolic‐androgenic steroids on clinically relevant outcome variables, however, does not mean that there is evidence of lack of effect. If researchers wish to conduct new randomised clinical trials they ought to be large and closely monitored for the occurrence of adverse events. We recommend that investigators report their trials according to guidelines described in the CONSORT Statement (www.consort‐statement.org).