Vitamin D, calcium or a combination of vitamin D and calcium for the treatment of nutritional rickets in children
Abstract
Background
Nutritional rickets is a disease which affects children, especially in low‐ and middle‐income countries. It causes problems such as skeletal deformities and impaired growth. The most common cause of nutritional rickets is vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D administered with or without calcium is commonly regarded as the mainstay of treatment. In some sunny countries, however, where children are believed to have adequate vitamin D production from exposure to ultraviolet light, but who are deficient in calcium due to low dietary intake, calcium alone has also been used in the treatment of nutritional rickets. Therefore, it is important to compare the effects of vitamin D, calcium or a combination of vitamin D and calcium for the treatment of nutritional rickets in children living in different settings.
Objectives
To assess the effects of vitamin D, calcium or a combination of vitamin D and calcium for the treatment of nutritional rickets in children.
Search methods
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, LILACS, WHO ICTRP Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search of all databases was 25 July 2019. We applied no language restrictions.
Selection criteria
We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) involving children aged 0 to 18 years with nutritional rickets which compared treatment with vitamin D, calcium or a combination of vitamin D and calcium.
Data collection and analysis
Two review authors independently screened the title and abstracts of all studies, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. We resolved any disagreements by consensus or recourse to a third review author. We conducted meta‐analyses for the outcomes reported by study authors. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) and, for continuous outcomes, we calculated mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs. We assessed the certainty of the evidence of the included studies using GRADE.
Main results
We identified 4562 studies; of these, we included four RCTs with 286 participants. The studies compared two or more of the following: vitamin D, calcium or vitamin D plus calcium. The number of participants randomised to receive vitamin D was 64, calcium was 102 and vitamin D plus calcium was 120. Two studies were conducted in India and two were conducted in Nigeria. None of the included studies had a low risk of bias in all domains. Three studies had a high risk of bias in at least one domain. The age of the participants ranged between six months and 14 years. The duration of follow‐up ranged between 12 weeks and 24 weeks.
Two studies compared vitamin D to calcium. There is low‐certainty evidence that, at 24 weeks' follow‐up, calcium alone improved the healing of rickets compared to vitamin D alone (RR 3.26, 95% CI 1.59 to 6.69; P = 0.001; 1 study, 71 participants). Comparing vitamin D to calcium showed no firm evidence of an advantage or disadvantage in reducing morbidity (fractures) (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.32; P = 0.23; 1 study, 71 participants; very low‐certainty evidence). Adverse events were not reported.
Two studies compared vitamin D plus calcium to vitamin D at 12 or 24 weeks. Vitamin D plus calcium improved healing of rickets compared to vitamin D alone at 24 weeks' follow‐up (RR 3.06, 95% CI 1.49 to 6.29; P = 0.002; 1 study, 75 participants; low‐certainty evidence). There is no conclusive evidence in favour of either intervention for reducing morbidity (fractures) (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.08; P = 0.20; 1 study, 71 participants; very low‐certainty evidence) or adverse events (RR 4.76, 95% CI 0.24 to 93.19; P = 0.30; 1 study, 39 participants; very low‐certainty evidence).
All four included studies compared vitamin D plus calcium to calcium at different follow‐up times. There is no conclusive evidence on whether vitamin D plus calcium in comparison to calcium alone improved healing of rickets at 24 weeks' follow‐up (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.90; P = 0.53; 2 studies, 140 participants; very low‐certainty evidence). Evidence is also inconclusive for morbidity (fractures) (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.06 to 13.76; P = 0.94; 1 study, 72 participants; very low‐certainty evidence) and adverse events (RR 4.29, 0.22 to 83.57; P = 0.34; 1 study, 37 participants; very low‐certainty evidence).
Most of the evidence in the review is low or very low certainty due to risk of bias, imprecision or both.
None of the included studies assessed all‐cause mortality, health‐related quality of life or socioeconomic effects. One study assessed growth pattern but this was not measured at the time‐point stipulated in the protocol of our review (one or more years after commencement of therapy).
Authors' conclusions
This review provides low‐certainty evidence that vitamin D plus calcium or calcium alone improve healing in children with nutritional rickets compared to vitamin D alone. We are unable to make conclusions on the effects of the interventions on adverse events or morbidity (fractures).
Author(s)
Moriam T Chibuzor, Diepiriye Graham‐Kalio, Joy O Osaji, Martin M Meremikwu
Abstract
Plain language summary
Vitamin D, calcium or a combination of vitamin D and calcium for the treatment of nutritional rickets in children
Review question
To assess the effects of vitamin D, calcium or a combination of vitamin D and calcium for the treatment of nutritional rickets in children.
Background
Nutritional rickets is a disease of the bones that affects mostly children in low‐ and middle‐income countries. Children with nutritional rickets typically have deformed bones, may not grow well and experience other health problems. A lack of vitamin D is the most common cause of nutritional rickets. As such, nutritional rickets is usually treated by giving the child vitamin D with or without calcium. In some sunny countries, however, calcium alone has been used to treat nutritional rickets in children who are believed to have adequate vitamin D from their exposure to sunlight but who lack adequate calcium in their diet. This review was conducted to find out whether vitamin D, calcium or a combination of vitamin D and calcium is best for the treatment of nutritional rickets in children.
Study characteristics
We found four randomised controlled trials (clinical trials where people are randomly put into one of two or more treatment groups) that compared vitamin D, calcium or a combination of vitamin D and calcium for the treatment of nutritional rickets in children. The 286 children in the studies were aged six months to 14 years. Following treatment, the children were monitored for between 12 and 24 weeks.
This evidence is up to date as of 25 July 2019.
Key results
We found evidence that using calcium alone or vitamin D plus calcium to treat nutritional rickets may improve healing when compared to using vitamin D alone. We are uncertain about the effects on fractures of calcium alone compared to vitamin D alone. We are uncertain about the effects on fractures or other side effects of vitamin D plus calcium compared to vitamin D alone. We are uncertain about the effects of vitamin D plus calcium compared to calcium alone on healing of rickets, fractures and side effects.
None of the studies reported on growth pattern (differences in height, weight, height for age, weight for age), death from any cause, socioeconomic effects (cost of treatment, resources lost due to illness or due to absence of the caregiver from work, cost of visits to hospital or health facility) and health‐related quality of life.
Reliability of the evidence
The reliability of the evidence for all the outcomes in our review is low or very low. The reason for the uncertainty is mostly due to the low number of participants in the studies and the low number of studies included in the review. Imprecise results and the potential to arrive at wrong conclusions because of the way the trials were conducted in some of the studies also contributed to the level of uncertainty.
Author(s)
Moriam T Chibuzor, Diepiriye Graham‐Kalio, Joy O Osaji, Martin M Meremikwu
Reviewer's Conclusions
Authors' conclusions
Implications for practice
Low‐certainty evidence showed that vitamin D plus calcium instead of vitamin D alone may lead to improvement in the healing of rickets. In comparison to vitamin D alone, administering calcium alone to children with rickets may improve the healing of rickets (low‐certainty evidence). We did not find sufficient evidence to support or discourage the current practice of vitamin D plus calcium for the treatment of nutritional rickets.
Implications for research
We found only four studies with small sample sizes for inclusion in this review. The studies were conducted in lower‐ or middle‐income countries. Most of the studies did not measure any of the secondary outcomes including patient‐important outcomes. Although one study measured growth pattern, this outcome was measured at 24 weeks which was too early to determine the impact of the intervention on growth. The risk of bias in some of the included studies and imprecision affected our ability to make firm conclusions on the certainty of the evidence.
More large, well‐conducted randomised controlled trials conducted in lower‐, middle‐ and high‐income countries and which assess the interventions in the review are needed. Such studies should measure all‐cause mortality, growth pattern, health‐related quality of life and socioeconomic effects in addition to the primary outcomes to enable us make firm conclusions about the effects of the interventions for treatment of nutritional rickets in children. Studies should have a longer follow‐up period to enable the researchers to measure outcomes such as growth pattern at time points which can provide meaningful evidence for clinical decision making.