Cochrane Abstracts
Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Biphasic Versus Triphasic Oral Contraceptives for Contraception." Cochrane Abstracts, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2024. Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437554/all/Biphasic_versus_triphasic_oral_contraceptives_for_contraception.
Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2024. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437554/all/Biphasic_versus_triphasic_oral_contraceptives_for_contraception. Accessed December 23, 2024.
Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception. (2024). In Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437554/all/Biphasic_versus_triphasic_oral_contraceptives_for_contraception
Biphasic Versus Triphasic Oral Contraceptives for Contraception [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2024. [cited 2024 December 23]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437554/all/Biphasic_versus_triphasic_oral_contraceptives_for_contraception.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception
ID - 437554
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437554/all/Biphasic_versus_triphasic_oral_contraceptives_for_contraception
PB - John Wiley & Sons, Inc
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -
