Cochrane Abstracts
Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs New
Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs New is a topic covered in the Cochrane Abstracts.
To view the entire topic, please log in or purchase a subscription.
Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Explore these free sample topics:
There's more to see -- the rest of this entry is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Bone Scintigraphy for Clinically Suspected Scaphoid Fractures in Patients With Negative Plain Radiographs New." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437452/all/Computed_tomography_versus_magnetic_resonance_imaging_versus_bone_scintigraphy_for_clinically_suspected_scaphoid_fractures_in_patients_with_negative_plain_radiographs_New. Accessed 25 January 2021.
Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs New. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437452/all/Computed_tomography_versus_magnetic_resonance_imaging_versus_bone_scintigraphy_for_clinically_suspected_scaphoid_fractures_in_patients_with_negative_plain_radiographs_New. Accessed January 25, 2021.
Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs New. In Cochrane Abstracts Retrieved January 25, 2021, from https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437452/all/Computed_tomography_versus_magnetic_resonance_imaging_versus_bone_scintigraphy_for_clinically_suspected_scaphoid_fractures_in_patients_with_negative_plain_radiographs_New
Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Bone Scintigraphy for Clinically Suspected Scaphoid Fractures in Patients With Negative Plain Radiographs New [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2021 January 25]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437452/all/Computed_tomography_versus_magnetic_resonance_imaging_versus_bone_scintigraphy_for_clinically_suspected_scaphoid_fractures_in_patients_with_negative_plain_radiographs_New.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs New
ID - 437452
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437452/all/Computed_tomography_versus_magnetic_resonance_imaging_versus_bone_scintigraphy_for_clinically_suspected_scaphoid_fractures_in_patients_with_negative_plain_radiographs_New
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -
