Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Detection of Acute Vascular Lesions in Patients Presenting With Stroke Symptoms." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437433/all/repview. Accessed 03 May 2024.
Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437433/all/repview. Accessed May 3, 2024.
Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437433/all/repview
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Detection of Acute Vascular Lesions in Patients Presenting With Stroke Symptoms [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 May 03]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437433/all/repview.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms
ID - 437433
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/437433/all/repview
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -