Cochrane Abstracts
Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Frameless Versus Classical Intrauterine Device for Contraception." Cochrane Abstracts, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2026. Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436883/all/Frameless_versus_classical_intrauterine_device_for_contraception.
Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception. Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2026. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436883/all/Frameless_versus_classical_intrauterine_device_for_contraception. Accessed March 9, 2026.
Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception. (2026). In Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436883/all/Frameless_versus_classical_intrauterine_device_for_contraception
Frameless Versus Classical Intrauterine Device for Contraception [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2026. [cited 2026 March 09]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436883/all/Frameless_versus_classical_intrauterine_device_for_contraception.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Frameless versus classical intrauterine device for contraception
ID - 436883
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436883/all/Frameless_versus_classical_intrauterine_device_for_contraception
PB - John Wiley & Sons, Inc
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -
