Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Endoscopic Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for Common Bile Duct Stones." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436724/all/images/tooltip-triangle.png. Accessed 28 April 2024.
Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436724/all/images/tooltip-triangle.png. Accessed April 28, 2024.
Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436724/all/images/tooltip-triangle.png
Endoscopic Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for Common Bile Duct Stones [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 April 28]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436724/all/images/tooltip-triangle.png.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones
ID - 436724
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436724/all/images/tooltip-triangle.png
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -