Cochrane Abstracts
High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome Edited (no change to conclusions)
High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome Edited (no change to conclusions) is a topic covered in the Cochrane Abstracts.
To view the entire topic, please log in or purchase a subscription.
Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Explore these free sample topics:
There's more to see -- the rest of this entry is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"High Versus Low Positive End‐expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Levels for Mechanically Ventilated Adult Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Edited (no Change to Conclusions)." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436607/2/High_versus_low_positive_end‐expiratory_pressure__PEEP__levels_for_mechanically_ventilated_adult_patients_with_acute_lung_injury_and_acute_respiratory_distress_syndrome_Edited__no_change_to_conclusions_. Accessed 16 January 2021.
High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome Edited (no change to conclusions). Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436607/2/High_versus_low_positive_end‐expiratory_pressure__PEEP__levels_for_mechanically_ventilated_adult_patients_with_acute_lung_injury_and_acute_respiratory_distress_syndrome_Edited__no_change_to_conclusions_. Accessed January 16, 2021.
High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome Edited (no change to conclusions). In Cochrane Abstracts Retrieved January 16, 2021, from https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436607/2/High_versus_low_positive_end‐expiratory_pressure__PEEP__levels_for_mechanically_ventilated_adult_patients_with_acute_lung_injury_and_acute_respiratory_distress_syndrome_Edited__no_change_to_conclusions_
High Versus Low Positive End‐expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Levels for Mechanically Ventilated Adult Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Edited (no Change to Conclusions) [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2021 January 16]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436607/2/High_versus_low_positive_end‐expiratory_pressure__PEEP__levels_for_mechanically_ventilated_adult_patients_with_acute_lung_injury_and_acute_respiratory_distress_syndrome_Edited__no_change_to_conclusions_.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome Edited (no change to conclusions)
ID - 436607
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436607/2/High_versus_low_positive_end‐expiratory_pressure__PEEP__levels_for_mechanically_ventilated_adult_patients_with_acute_lung_injury_and_acute_respiratory_distress_syndrome_Edited__no_change_to_conclusions_
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -
