Endovascular versus conventional medical treatment for uncomplicated chronic type B aortic dissection: Cochrane systematic review
Endovascular versus conventional medical treatment for uncomplicated chronic type B aortic dissection: Cochrane systematic review is a topic covered in the Cochrane Abstracts.
To view the entire topic, please log in or purchase a subscription.
Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Explore these free sample topics:
There's more to see -- the rest of this entry is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Endovascular Versus Conventional Medical Treatment for Uncomplicated Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection: Cochrane Systematic Review." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436227/all/Endovascular_versus_conventional_medical_treatment_for_uncomplicated_chronic_type_B_aortic_dissection:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed 24 February 2021.
Endovascular versus conventional medical treatment for uncomplicated chronic type B aortic dissection: Cochrane systematic review. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436227/all/Endovascular_versus_conventional_medical_treatment_for_uncomplicated_chronic_type_B_aortic_dissection:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed February 24, 2021.
Endovascular versus conventional medical treatment for uncomplicated chronic type B aortic dissection: Cochrane systematic review. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436227/all/Endovascular_versus_conventional_medical_treatment_for_uncomplicated_chronic_type_B_aortic_dissection:_Cochrane_systematic_review
Endovascular Versus Conventional Medical Treatment for Uncomplicated Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection: Cochrane Systematic Review [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2021 February 24]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436227/all/Endovascular_versus_conventional_medical_treatment_for_uncomplicated_chronic_type_B_aortic_dissection:_Cochrane_systematic_review.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Endovascular versus conventional medical treatment for uncomplicated chronic type B aortic dissection: Cochrane systematic review
ID - 436227
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436227/all/Endovascular_versus_conventional_medical_treatment_for_uncomplicated_chronic_type_B_aortic_dissection:_Cochrane_systematic_review
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -