Routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction versus no suction at birth
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Routine Oro/nasopharyngeal Suction Versus No Suction at Birth." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436141/all/Phlebotonics_for_haemorrhoids:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed 29 March 2024.
Routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction versus no suction at birth. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436141/all/Phlebotonics_for_haemorrhoids:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed March 29, 2024.
Routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction versus no suction at birth. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436141/all/Phlebotonics_for_haemorrhoids:_Cochrane_systematic_review
Routine Oro/nasopharyngeal Suction Versus No Suction at Birth [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 March 29]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436141/all/Phlebotonics_for_haemorrhoids:_Cochrane_systematic_review.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction versus no suction at birth
ID - 436141
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436141/all/Phlebotonics_for_haemorrhoids:_Cochrane_systematic_review
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -