High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"High‐frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436008/all/Interventions_for_treating_phosphorus_burns:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed 19 March 2024.
High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436008/all/Interventions_for_treating_phosphorus_burns:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed March 19, 2024.
High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436008/all/Interventions_for_treating_phosphorus_burns:_Cochrane_systematic_review
High‐frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 March 19]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436008/all/Interventions_for_treating_phosphorus_burns:_Cochrane_systematic_review.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome
ID - 436008
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436008/all/Interventions_for_treating_phosphorus_burns:_Cochrane_systematic_review
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -