En‐bloc resection versus conventional transurethral resection for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"En‐bloc Resection Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection for Patients With Non‐muscle‐invasive Bladder Cancer." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436006/0/Micronutrient_supplementation_in_pregnant_women_with_HIV_infection:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed 26 April 2024.
En‐bloc resection versus conventional transurethral resection for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436006/0/Micronutrient_supplementation_in_pregnant_women_with_HIV_infection:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed April 26, 2024.
En‐bloc resection versus conventional transurethral resection for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436006/0/Micronutrient_supplementation_in_pregnant_women_with_HIV_infection:_Cochrane_systematic_review
En‐bloc Resection Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection for Patients With Non‐muscle‐invasive Bladder Cancer [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 April 26]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436006/0/Micronutrient_supplementation_in_pregnant_women_with_HIV_infection:_Cochrane_systematic_review.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - En‐bloc resection versus conventional transurethral resection for patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
ID - 436006
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/436006/0/Micronutrient_supplementation_in_pregnant_women_with_HIV_infection:_Cochrane_systematic_review
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -