Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms: Cochrane systematic review (diagnostic test accuracy)

Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms: Cochrane systematic review (diagnostic test accuracy) is a topic covered in the Cochrane Abstracts.

To view the entire topic, please or purchase a subscription.

Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Explore these free sample topics:

Evidence Central

Citation

* When formatting your citation, note that all book, journal, and database titles should be italicized* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC T1 - Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms: Cochrane systematic review (diagnostic test accuracy) ID - 435023 BT - Cochrane Abstracts UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/435023/all/Magnetic_resonance_imaging_versus_computed_tomography_for_detection_of_acute_vascular_lesions_in_patients_presenting_with_stroke_symptoms:_Cochrane_systematic_review__diagnostic_test_accuracy_ DB - Evidence Central DP - Unbound Medicine ER -