Tags

Type your tag names separated by a space and hit enter

Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms: Cochrane systematic review (diagnostic test accuracy)

Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms: Cochrane systematic review (diagnostic test accuracy) is a topic covered in the Cochrane Abstracts.

To view the entire topic, please or purchase a subscription.

Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Explore these free sample topics:

Evidence Central

Citation

"Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Detection of Acute Vascular Lesions in Patients Presenting With Stroke Symptoms: Cochrane Systematic Review (diagnostic Test Accuracy)." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/435023/all/Magnetic_resonance_imaging_versus_computed_tomography_for_detection_of_acute_vascular_lesions_in_patients_presenting_with_stroke_symptoms:_Cochrane_systematic_review__diagnostic_test_accuracy_. Accessed 21 July 2019.
Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms: Cochrane systematic review (diagnostic test accuracy). Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/435023/all/Magnetic_resonance_imaging_versus_computed_tomography_for_detection_of_acute_vascular_lesions_in_patients_presenting_with_stroke_symptoms:_Cochrane_systematic_review__diagnostic_test_accuracy_. Accessed July 21, 2019.
Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms: Cochrane systematic review (diagnostic test accuracy). In Cochrane Abstracts. Available from https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/435023/all/Magnetic_resonance_imaging_versus_computed_tomography_for_detection_of_acute_vascular_lesions_in_patients_presenting_with_stroke_symptoms:_Cochrane_systematic_review__diagnostic_test_accuracy_
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Detection of Acute Vascular Lesions in Patients Presenting With Stroke Symptoms: Cochrane Systematic Review (diagnostic Test Accuracy) [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2019 July 21]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/435023/all/Magnetic_resonance_imaging_versus_computed_tomography_for_detection_of_acute_vascular_lesions_in_patients_presenting_with_stroke_symptoms:_Cochrane_systematic_review__diagnostic_test_accuracy_.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC T1 - Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms: Cochrane systematic review (diagnostic test accuracy) ID - 435023 BT - Cochrane Abstracts UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/435023/all/Magnetic_resonance_imaging_versus_computed_tomography_for_detection_of_acute_vascular_lesions_in_patients_presenting_with_stroke_symptoms:_Cochrane_systematic_review__diagnostic_test_accuracy_ DB - Evidence Central DP - Unbound Medicine ER -