Cochrane Abstracts
Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Nonlatex Versus Latex Male Condoms for Contraception." Cochrane Abstracts, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2024. Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434885/all/Nonlatex_versus_latex_male_condoms_for_contraception.
Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception. Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2024. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434885/all/Nonlatex_versus_latex_male_condoms_for_contraception. Accessed November 23, 2024.
Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception. (2024). In Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434885/all/Nonlatex_versus_latex_male_condoms_for_contraception
Nonlatex Versus Latex Male Condoms for Contraception [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2024. [cited 2024 November 23]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434885/all/Nonlatex_versus_latex_male_condoms_for_contraception.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception
ID - 434885
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434885/all/Nonlatex_versus_latex_male_condoms_for_contraception
PB - John Wiley & Sons, Inc
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -
