Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Nonlatex Versus Latex Male Condoms for Contraception." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434885/2/Bisphosphonates_in_multiple_myeloma:_an_updated_network_meta_analysis:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed 23 April 2024.
Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434885/2/Bisphosphonates_in_multiple_myeloma:_an_updated_network_meta_analysis:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed April 23, 2024.
Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434885/2/Bisphosphonates_in_multiple_myeloma:_an_updated_network_meta_analysis:_Cochrane_systematic_review
Nonlatex Versus Latex Male Condoms for Contraception [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 April 23]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434885/2/Bisphosphonates_in_multiple_myeloma:_an_updated_network_meta_analysis:_Cochrane_systematic_review.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Nonlatex versus latex male condoms for contraception
ID - 434885
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434885/2/Bisphosphonates_in_multiple_myeloma:_an_updated_network_meta_analysis:_Cochrane_systematic_review
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -