Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Bone Scintigraphy for Clinically Suspected Scaphoid Fractures in Patients With Negative Plain Radiographs." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434291/all/images/repview. Accessed 21 May 2024.
Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434291/all/images/repview. Accessed May 21, 2024.
Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434291/all/images/repview
Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Bone Scintigraphy for Clinically Suspected Scaphoid Fractures in Patients With Negative Plain Radiographs [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 May 21]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434291/all/images/repview.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs
ID - 434291
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434291/all/images/repview
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -