Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Bone Scintigraphy for Clinically Suspected Scaphoid Fractures in Patients With Negative Plain Radiographs." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434291/all/images/google-play-badge.png. Accessed 30 April 2024.
Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434291/all/images/google-play-badge.png. Accessed April 30, 2024.
Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434291/all/images/google-play-badge.png
Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Bone Scintigraphy for Clinically Suspected Scaphoid Fractures in Patients With Negative Plain Radiographs [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 April 30]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434291/all/images/google-play-badge.png.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs
ID - 434291
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434291/all/images/google-play-badge.png
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -