High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"High Versus Low Positive End‐expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Levels for Mechanically Ventilated Adult Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434101/0/repview. Accessed 02 May 2024.
High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434101/0/repview. Accessed May 2, 2024.
High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434101/0/repview
High Versus Low Positive End‐expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Levels for Mechanically Ventilated Adult Patients With Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2024 May 02]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434101/0/repview.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - High versus low positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
ID - 434101
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/434101/0/repview
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -