Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure compared to conventional ventilation for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in children: Cochrane systematic review
Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure compared to conventional ventilation for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in children: Cochrane systematic review is a topic covered in the Cochrane Abstracts.
To view the entire topic, please log in or purchase a subscription.
Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Explore these free sample topics:
There's more to see -- the rest of this entry is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Compared to Conventional Ventilation for Acute Hypoxaemic Respiratory Failure in Children: Cochrane Systematic Review." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431571/all/Continuous_negative_extrathoracic_pressure_or_continuous_positive_airway_pressure_compared_to_conventional_ventilation_for_acute_hypoxaemic_respiratory_failure_in_children:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed 26 February 2021.
Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure compared to conventional ventilation for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in children: Cochrane systematic review. Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431571/all/Continuous_negative_extrathoracic_pressure_or_continuous_positive_airway_pressure_compared_to_conventional_ventilation_for_acute_hypoxaemic_respiratory_failure_in_children:_Cochrane_systematic_review. Accessed February 26, 2021.
Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure compared to conventional ventilation for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in children: Cochrane systematic review. In Cochrane Abstracts https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431571/all/Continuous_negative_extrathoracic_pressure_or_continuous_positive_airway_pressure_compared_to_conventional_ventilation_for_acute_hypoxaemic_respiratory_failure_in_children:_Cochrane_systematic_review
Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Compared to Conventional Ventilation for Acute Hypoxaemic Respiratory Failure in Children: Cochrane Systematic Review [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2021 February 26]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431571/all/Continuous_negative_extrathoracic_pressure_or_continuous_positive_airway_pressure_compared_to_conventional_ventilation_for_acute_hypoxaemic_respiratory_failure_in_children:_Cochrane_systematic_review.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Continuous negative extrathoracic pressure or continuous positive airway pressure compared to conventional ventilation for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in children: Cochrane systematic review
ID - 431571
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431571/all/Continuous_negative_extrathoracic_pressure_or_continuous_positive_airway_pressure_compared_to_conventional_ventilation_for_acute_hypoxaemic_respiratory_failure_in_children:_Cochrane_systematic_review
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -