Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants Edited (no change to conclusions)
Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants Edited (no change to conclusions) is a topic covered in the Cochrane Abstracts.
To view the entire topic, please log in or purchase a subscription.
Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Explore these free sample topics:
There's more to see -- the rest of this entry is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Rescue High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Pulmonary Dysfunction in Preterm Infants Edited (no Change to Conclusions)." Cochrane Abstracts, Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431484/all/Rescue_high_frequency_oscillatory_ventilation_versus_conventional_ventilation_for_pulmonary_dysfunction_in_preterm_infants_Edited__no_change_to_conclusions_. Accessed 15 January 2021.
Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants Edited (no change to conclusions). Cochrane Abstracts. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431484/all/Rescue_high_frequency_oscillatory_ventilation_versus_conventional_ventilation_for_pulmonary_dysfunction_in_preterm_infants_Edited__no_change_to_conclusions_. Accessed January 15, 2021.
Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants Edited (no change to conclusions). In Cochrane Abstracts Retrieved January 15, 2021, from https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431484/all/Rescue_high_frequency_oscillatory_ventilation_versus_conventional_ventilation_for_pulmonary_dysfunction_in_preterm_infants_Edited__no_change_to_conclusions_
Rescue High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Pulmonary Dysfunction in Preterm Infants Edited (no Change to Conclusions) [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. [cited 2021 January 15]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431484/all/Rescue_high_frequency_oscillatory_ventilation_versus_conventional_ventilation_for_pulmonary_dysfunction_in_preterm_infants_Edited__no_change_to_conclusions_.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Rescue high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants Edited (no change to conclusions)
ID - 431484
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431484/all/Rescue_high_frequency_oscillatory_ventilation_versus_conventional_ventilation_for_pulmonary_dysfunction_in_preterm_infants_Edited__no_change_to_conclusions_
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -