Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia correction: Cochrane systematic review

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia correction: Cochrane systematic review is a topic covered in the Cochrane Abstracts.

To view the entire topic, please or purchase a subscription.

Evidence Central is an integrated web and mobile solution that helps clinicians quickly answer etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis questions using the latest evidence-based research. Explore these free sample topics:

Evidence Central

Citation

* When formatting your citation, note that all book, journal, and database titles should be italicized* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC T1 - Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia correction: Cochrane systematic review ID - 431470 BT - Cochrane Abstracts UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431470/all/Photorefractive_keratectomy__PRK__versus_laser_assisted_in_situ_keratomileusis__LASIK__for_hyperopia_correction:_Cochrane_systematic_review DB - Evidence Central DP - Unbound Medicine ER -