Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
There's more to see -- the rest of this topic is available only to subscribers.
Citation
"Combined Spinal‐epidural Versus Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section." Cochrane Abstracts, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2024. Evidence Central, evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431322/all/Combined_spinal‐epidural_versus_spinal_anaesthesia_for_caesarean_section.
Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2024. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431322/all/Combined_spinal‐epidural_versus_spinal_anaesthesia_for_caesarean_section. Accessed December 12, 2024.
Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. (2024). In Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431322/all/Combined_spinal‐epidural_versus_spinal_anaesthesia_for_caesarean_section
Combined Spinal‐epidural Versus Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section [Internet]. In: Cochrane Abstracts. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2024. [cited 2024 December 12]. Available from: https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431322/all/Combined_spinal‐epidural_versus_spinal_anaesthesia_for_caesarean_section.
* Article titles in AMA citation format should be in sentence-case
TY - ELEC
T1 - Combined spinal‐epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
ID - 431322
BT - Cochrane Abstracts
UR - https://evidence.unboundmedicine.com/evidence/view/Cochrane/431322/all/Combined_spinal‐epidural_versus_spinal_anaesthesia_for_caesarean_section
PB - John Wiley & Sons, Inc
DB - Evidence Central
DP - Unbound Medicine
ER -